SOC 2 Quality Checker - Analyze Your Audit Reports

This is a sample analysis report demonstrating the quality assessment output. Upload your own SOC 2 report to get a real analysis.

Cloud analysis complete

Sample_SOC2_Report.pdf

0out of 100

CWhat's this?

This SOC 2 report demonstrates several areas of strength, particularly in scoping clarity and test procedure alignment. However, significant improvements are needed in control specificity and evidence documentation. The report frequently uses generic boilerplate language that makes it difficult to assess the actual security implementation.

Executive Summary

Key findings from your SOC 2 report analysis

Key Findings

32 of 58 controls use organization-specific language rather than generic templates
Test procedures align with stated controls in 78% of cases
Evidence references are missing or vague for 15 controls
System scope is clearly defined with appropriate boundaries
4 exceptions identified, but only 1 has complete root cause documentation

Top Issues

Access control section uses generic language like "authorized personnel" without defining specific roles
Monitoring controls lack frequency specifications - uses "periodically" instead of specific intervals
Evidence descriptions don't include dates or specific artifact references
Exception E-2 and E-3 lack root cause analysis and remediation timelines

Strongest Areas

Clear scope definition identifying production AWS environment and exclusions with rationale
Well-documented subservice organization handling with appropriate carve-out methodology
Strong change management controls with specific approval workflows described

Rubric Breakdown

Detailed scores for each quality category

Benchmarking

How your report compares to others analyzed (anonymous data)

Loading benchmark data...

Detailed Findings

Specific issues found with recommendations for improvement

Actions

Download, share, or analyze another report

Improve Your SOC 2 Quality

Want to improve your SOC 2 report quality? Check out these resources:

SOC 2 Quality Rubric|Quality Writing Tips|Frequently Asked Questions

Key Findings

Top Issues

Strongest Areas

Control Specificity55%

Test-to-Control Alignment78%

Evidence Quality52%

Scoping Clarity88%

Exception Handling48%

Narrative Quality72%

Pervasive Use of Generic Access Control LanguagehighThe access management section consistently uses boilerplate language without organization-specific details. Terms like 'authorized personnel', 'appropriate access', and 'relevant systems' appear throughout without definition.

Missing or Vague Evidence Referenceshigh15 test procedures lack specific evidence citations. When evidence is mentioned, descriptions are too vague to verify completeness (e.g., 'documentation reviewed', 'evidence obtained').

Incomplete Exception Documentationhigh3 of 4 exceptions lack root cause analysis and remediation plans. Exception documentation states the deviation but doesn't explain why it occurred or how recurrence will be prevented.

Unspecified Monitoring Frequenciesmedium12 monitoring and review controls use terms like 'periodically', 'regularly', or 'in a timely manner' without specifying actual frequencies.

Test Procedures Rely Heavily on InquirymediumSeveral test procedures rely solely on management inquiry without corroborating evidence from inspection or observation.

Limited Security Architecture Detail in NarrativelowThe system description provides adequate context but lacks detail on security architecture, encryption implementation, and network segmentation.

Improve Your SOC 2 Quality